Hi Simon, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 11 November 2014 22:21, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Some toolchains put the relocation data into separate sections. Adjust the >>> linker script to catch this case. Without relocation data, U-Boot will not >>> boot. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> >>> arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds | 4 +++- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds >>> index f48bff5..95ab7dd 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds >>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds >>> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ SECTIONS >>> >>> . = ALIGN(4); >>> __rel_dyn_start = .; >>> - .rel.dyn : { *(.rel.dyn) } >>> + .rel.dyn : { >>> + *(.rel.*) >> >> Should it be more generic to use *(.rel*) here? > > I suspect that would be safe, but why?
Just in case some weird toolchain omit the "." afer "rel". Which toolchain are you using now that exposes such behavior? >> >>> + } >>> __rel_dyn_end = .; >>> . = ALIGN(4); >>> _end = .; >>> -- > > Regards, > Simon Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot