Hi Simon, On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:31:59 -0700 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Dec 5, 2014 8:32 AM, "Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > The uclass implements the same operations as the current I2C framework but > > makes some changes to make it fit driver model better: > > > > - Remove the chip address from API calls > > - Remove the address length from API calls > > - Remove concept of 'current' I2C bus > > - Drop all existing init functions > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > Changes in v5: > > - Add a function comment for i2c_probe_chip() > > - Add an assert for offset_len in i2c_setup_offset() > > - Add more detail to return value comment on get_buf_speed() > > - Add more detail to return value comment on xfer() method > > - Fix -INVAL typo > > - Make i2c_get_bus_speed() independent of i2c_set_bus_speed() > > - Split DM_I2C_CHIP_RD_ADDRESS into read and write varaints > > - Update comments in struct i2c_msg to allow buf to be NULL > > - Use a NULL buffer in i2c_probe_chip() > > Any. Ore comments please? Otherwise I will retest and apply this version. Sorry, I have been pretty busy early of this week. Hopefully I will have some time to test this version tomorrow and will issue my Reviewed-by credit. Please wait a couple of days. Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
