Hi Bin, On 3 January 2015 at 19:36, Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On 3 January 2015 at 18:59, Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Otavio, >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Currently when U-Boot is loaded by coreboot in qemu, U-Boot does not >>>>> boot due to several issues. This patch series fix these issues to make >>>>> coreboot support in U-Boot more robust so that it can run on top of >>>>> qemu out of the box. >>>>> >>>>> The command to package u-boot into coreboot.rom: >>>>> ./build/util/cbfstool/cbfstool build/coreboot.rom add-flat-binary \ >>>>> -f u-boot-dtb.bin -n fallback/payload -c lzma -l 0x1110000 -e 0x1110015 >>>> >>>> It'd be awesome to have it documented somewhere :) >>> >>> Yes, I can document it in README.x86. >> >> Thanks. Also does qemu run U-Boot bare? I assume not. What is the main >> use case for Coreboot + U-Boot under qemu? >> > > So far only coreboot can run bare on qemu. It is a specific board > (Emulation board) for qemu in coreboot Kconfig. We can support qemu > running U-Boot bare as well. It is just a matter of time of doing > that. If you think this might be helpful, I can spend some time to > support qemu bare in U-Boot. As for the main use case, I believe this > provides us a way of testing U-Boot coreboot support without a real > hardware, just like the purpose of any emulation/simulation tool we > have in the market.
OK thanks for the info. It seems like it might be useful. Presumably it can run without binary blobs which would be good. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
