Apparently, members of clk_bit_info array do not map correctly
to the members of enum periph_id. This mapping got broken after
we changed periph_id(s) to reflect interrupt number instead of
their position in a sequence. This patch intends to fix above
mentioned issue.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <aksha...@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Removed exynos5_bit_info array name.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index b31c13b..519928c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -20,42 +20,49 @@
* positions of the peripheral clocks of the src and div registers
*/
struct clk_bit_info {
+ enum periph_id id;
int8_t src_bit;
int8_t div_bit;
int8_t prediv_bit;
};
-/* src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
+/* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
- {0, 0, -1},
- {4, 4, -1},
- {8, 8, -1},
- {12, 12, -1},
- {0, 0, 8},
- {4, 16, 24},
- {8, 0, 8},
- {12, 16, 24},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {16, 0, 8},
- {20, 16, 24},
- {24, 0, 8},
- {0, 0, 4},
- {4, 12, 16},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 12, 12, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 16, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 20, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 24, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3, 12, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, -1, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, -1, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SROMC, -1, -1, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 0, 0, 4},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 4, 12, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, -1, -1},
+
+ {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
};
/* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
@@ -260,9 +267,21 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
return fout;
}
+static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
+ if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return &clk_bit_info[i];
+}
+
static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
{
- struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = &clk_bit_info[peripheral];
+ struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
unsigned long sclk, sub_clk;
unsigned int src, div, sub_div;
struct exynos5_clock *clk =
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
