On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:49:08PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 30 January 2015 15:19:53 Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is > > > working fine. There is no visible difference between legacy > > > and generic board code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]> > > > > Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks! > > Tom, or anybody else, in future when you are going to change some > parts in u-boot and remove boards which do not convert in time... > please can you contact me about it (via email, I see that contact > info in file board/nokia/rx51/MAINTAINERS is correct)? I'm not > following u-boot ML and I really did not know that conversion to > generic board code is required before end of last year... > > Basically Maemo users & developers use uboot v2013.04 version and > for Nokia N900 there is no new functionality in new uboot > versions. So there is nothing like "new features & fixed bugs" > motivation. > > But I do not want to see n900 board code removed from uboot as > uboot bootloader is for n900 really useful (most for end-users > who does not even know about existence of git, uboot ML, etc).
Before we do the (very soon now, -rc1 comes Monday) nuking, any board with a MAINTAINERS will get a CC, yes. But I expect MAINTAINERS to do some sort of sanity test at least once every few releases, especially since we have a regular release cycle. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
