Hi Michal, On 3 February 2015 at 02:26, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 02/03/2015 12:58 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> On 2 February 2015 at 08:46, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: >>> Compile code with -fPIC to get GOT. Do not build SPL >>> with fPIC because it increasing SPL size for nothing. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Use dram_init instead of init_func_ram() >>> Suggested by Simon >>> >>> This code requires >>> "common/board_r: manual relocation for cmd table" >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/201965.html >>> >>> Not fully happy about it because compare to previous solution adds >>> almost +60k on size for doing the same thing as before. >>> >>> 15: microblaze: Move architecture to use generic board init >>> microblaze: (for 1/1 boards) all +52268.0 bss -4.0 data +11724.0 >>> rodata -2676.0 spl/u-boot-spl:all +36.0 spl/u-boot-spl:data +36.0 >>> text +43224.0 >>> microblaze-generic: all +52268 bss -4 data +11724 rodata >>> -2676 spl/u-boot-spl:all +36 spl/u-boot-spl:data +36 text +43224 >>> >>> Depends on: >>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-January/203277.html >> >> Yes that seems crazy. >> >> You can use -B to see what code is added. Can you figure it out? > > I was checking this with our toolchain guy and expectation with fPIC/fPIE > is 20% bigger code and I am below that. > > I was checking -B output too and it is adding bytes to every function > that's why the sum is that big.
OK, that's unfortunate but sounds like it is a feature of the architecture, so nothing wrong with U-Boot per se. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot