On 10:18 Thu 25 Jun , Tom wrote: > Nishanth Menon wrote: > >Shilimkar, Santosh said the following on 06/25/2009 04:51 PM: > <snip> > >> > >>So essentially u-boot would be almost same as Cortex-A8 except you should > >>avoid programming AuxControl > >>register because the bit definitions are different. > >> > >>Hope this helps > >so how would the new arch look like? do we do: > >cpu/arm_cortexa8_9 and common code there? > Given my recent experience with common code for i2c on omp24xx and omap3, > I would prefer if they were separate and had no common code. no sorry I'm bored to copy & paster of code everywhere specialy on arm > > cpu/arm_cortexa8 > cpu/arm_cortexa9 I do not want to see this anymore > > So A8 can be more easily maintained. it will be a mess on start.S for 2 or 3 specific code line so no > As A9 matures, it will diverge more from A8. for now I think merge them make more sense if it will require in the futur to separte them we will see but for now no
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
