Hi Mike, > On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:41:13 Detlev Zundel wrote: >> >>> It is this "certification is only possible like we say" attitude which >> >>> I seriously question. >> >> >> >> whether you question this attitude doesnt matter. you arent a lawyer in >> >> general, you arent a lawyer for these companies, and you arent >> >> indemnifying them. their legal review says that it's a requirement, so >> >> it is now a requirement for the software. anything beyond that is >> >> irrelevant. >> > >> > Now was this so hard? This is actually an important fact that it is a >> > legal requirement for a company - thanks. >> >> As a quick web research did not help, if this is a legal requirement, >> then can you point me to the law which requires such a thing? > > nothing personal, but ... > > (1) you still arent a lawyer > (2) i never said there was a law that stated this > (3) i did say "their legal team came to the conclusion that ..." > > the law and your interpretation of it is irrelevant.
Wow, the law is irrelevant. I give up. You repeatedly claim stuff without backing anything up. There is nothing more I can gain from this discussion, so I let it rest. Cheers Detlev -- Deutsches Grundgesetz Artikel 14 Absatz 2: Eigentum verpflichtet. Sein Gebrauch soll zugleich dem Wohle der Allgemeinheit dienen. -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: d...@denx.de _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
