On 02/25/2015 03:23 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 08:32 -0600, [email protected] a [...] >> That said, Paul, if you could contribute patches to the effect of >> integrating all these platforms to ti_*_common.h, that'd be great. > > I will try to come up with a common configuration for omap3 (and > possibly omap4 and omap5 too). Do you mind if I drop the ti_ prefix? I > don't feel it's relevant to mention the chip manufacturer there, > especially when it's not used anywhere else in the tree (except for the > boards that are actually procuced by TI such as the evms, etc). > I think we have maintained ti_ prefix for omap3,4,5 etc.. might make sense to retain that.. but then, I am no decision maker in that regards, I suggest posting a proposal and seeing feedback folks have w.r.t.
-- Regards, Nishanth Menon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
