On 03/19/2015 12:58 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 12:54 -0700, York Sun wrote: >> >> On 03/19/2015 12:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:14 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:45:48PM +0000, York Sun wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> >>> >>> York, where's your signoff since you're the one submitting the patch? >> >> I am sending many patches in this set. Since I didn't contribute to this >> patch, >> I didn't add my signed-off-by. > > That's not what signed-off-by means. I realize (though never understood > why) the U-Boot project differs from Linux rules in terms of whether > custodians are expected to sign off patches when applying, but does that > extend to submitting patches by e-mail as well? >
I don't have the answer myself. I haven't added any of my signed-off-by for the patches I squashed/tested/sent. For small patch set, I would request the original author to send each patch. For large set with dependency, I send patch on behalf of the authors. I don't want to take credit for the patch I didn't contribute the change. I test all of them though. If the signed-off-by has different meanings, I am OK to change my practice. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot