On 2015-04-07 16:24, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > On 7 Apr 2015, ste...@agner.ch wrote: >> On 2015-04-02 22:30, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: >>> On 2 Apr 2015, ste...@agner.ch wrote: > >>> [snip] > >>> I also measured 'write performance' with the mtd_speedtest >>> (performing similar patch to the Linux driver) and I see no >>> difference. I think a write benchmark is more appropriate to test >>> this functionality? While at least it seems that neither read nor >>> write is affected by the simplification. > >> On U-Boot, I just benchmarked the overall boot time since this is most >> important for us. I plan to (re-)integrate the changes into the Linux >> driver and check the performance again later this week. > >> Thanks for for the write test. So I can take this as a Ack? > > Of course, if you want it, > > Acked-by: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlem...@nbsps.com>
Thx > The OOB patch also significantly decreases UbiFS mounting time in Linux. > I load Linux itself via tftp/network and not using u-boot with nand. I > guess I should try that. Is it UBIFS mounting time or is it bad block scanning? Afaik, it should speed up the latter significantly, but I don't see why it should speed up the former. -- Stefan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
