On Monday 06 July 2009 04:47:41 Stefan Roese wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 10:37:10 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 06 July 2009 03:25:43 Stefan Roese wrote: > > > On Monday 06 July 2009 09:04:44 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > we would want to avoid ambiguity -- is > > > > "nor" referring to the nor flashes or is it referring to a partition > > > > named "nor". > > > > > > The first version would refer "nor" as flash type and the 2nd one > > > "nor0" as a device name from mtdparts/mtdids. > > > > so people wouldnt be able to name a mtdpart "nor" > > Yes, this doesn't make much sense. It's probably better to only use the 2nd > approach via the mtdparts/mtdids name.
when mtdparts support is enabled, sure. the logic could be fairly dynamic -- if you give it two args, it is referring to a flash type and a flash #. if you give it one, it defaults to mtdparts if it's enabled. if no mtdpart exists named that way, it falls back to flash type and flash 0. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
