Hi,
On 11-06-15 18:12, Joe Hershberger wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:14:33AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:12:16PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Select CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR by default rather then
needing to have this in every sunxi defconfig file.
This also fixes the Merrii_A80_Optimus defconfig no longer building.
Cc: Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@enea.com>
Reported-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@enea.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Joe? Masahiro? It feels like something has gone wrong with the
conversion here. Or do people need to get used to the defconfig files
being a non-trivial size? Or do we need some more default y if ...
lines around things? Or a few of the above? Thanks!
I'm surprised you pulled this in for -rc2. I guess we can always revert it.
OK, so where did we end up again exactly? Ah yes, (a) we can't
unexpectedly break peoples build. So I took this for now.
This isn't fixing a breakage...
It does fix breakage as stated i the commit message the Merrii_A80_Optimus
target was broken by your patch, likely because your patch was generated
against a tree which did not have that one yet.
it simply reduced the size of the sunxi boards' defconfig
That is because I choose a solution were I do not need to fix this over
and over again and one were something which comes pretty close to
pure noise was poluting all the sunxi defconfigs.
> and caused defconfig noise in every other
board when running savedefconfig.
I did not realize that, sorry about that.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
