On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:22:21PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Igor, > > In message <558979e4.9030...@compulab.co.il> you wrote: > > > > > In other words, I cannot reproduce your issue here. > > > > May be it has something to do with my git version? > > $ git --version > > git version 2.3.6 > > I did my tests with: > > -> git --version > git version 2.1.0 > > [This is what Fedora 21 uses.] > > > In Fedora 22 I get > > -> git --version > git version 2.4.2 > > which then shows: > > -> git fsck --full > Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done. > error in tag eb394f56db3e05d00891d6dc36a00df0025cf255: unterminated header > error in tag 9bf86baaa3b35b25baa2d664e2f7f6cafad689ee: unterminated header > error in tag c7071e6d645a8e13adb0d4cea2caad27213fa62f: unterminated header > Checking objects: 100% (328644/328644), done. > Checking connectivity: 325719, done. > > > > $ git fsck --full > > Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done. > > error in tag eb394f56db3e05d00891d6dc36a00df0025cf255: unterminated header > > error in tag 9bf86baaa3b35b25baa2d664e2f7f6cafad689ee: unterminated header > > error in tag c7071e6d645a8e13adb0d4cea2caad27213fa62f: unterminated header > > Checking objects: 100% (325719/325719), done. > > Checking connectivity: 325719, done. > > Confirmed. > > > It seems that the check for termination with '\n' in tag headers > > started to be a requirement from git version 2.2.0? > > I think you are right. The fact that v2.1.0 does not show anything > but v2.3.6 and v2.4.2 do also supports your analysis. > > > This [1] seems to be the patch that triggers the message I see. > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/git/git/commit/4d0d89755e82c40df88cf94d84031978f8eac827 > > Yes, I agree. > > So apparently the tags LABEL_2006_03_12_0025, LABEL_2006_04_18_1106, > and LABEL_2006_05_19_1133 are affected. > > IIUC it should be a harmless thing to just recreate the same tags > (referring to the same commits)? Or can anybody see any problems tha > might be caused by such a tag re-creation? I mean, it is not like a > rebase of the repository or something like that? Right?
Lets take it up on the git list and ask for help/advice? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot