Hi Yegor, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Yegor Yefremov <yegorsli...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Yegor Yefremov > <yegorsli...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Hershberger >> <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:15:27PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: >>>> >>>>> This config defined a CONS_INDEX as a config but did not define it in >>>>> any Kconfig, so savedefconfig will delete that entry. Use >>>>> CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS for now until that is added to Kconfig. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig | 3 +-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig >>>>> b/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig >>>>> index 679b04f..030cb51 100644 >>>>> --- a/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig >>>>> +++ b/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig >>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ >>>>> CONFIG_SPL=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y >>>>> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x82000000 >>>>> -CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="NAND" >>>>> -CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=1 >>>>> +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="CONS_INDEX=1,NAND" >>>>> CONFIG_ARM=y >>>>> CONFIG_TARGET_AM335X_BALTOS=y >>>> >>>> No, something else is wrong. board/vscom/baltos/Kconfig has CONS_INDEX >>>> (like the other am335x boards and yes this needs moving to a better >>>> place). >>> >>> Any thoughts on what's wrong, then? I'm at FTF this week and won't be >>> debugging it until next week. There was an issue with this board, >>> caused by savedefconfig, which is why I even noticed this board exists >>> now. Maybe whoever added it (Yegor Yefremov) didn't try safedefconfig >>> against the board? >>> >>> If nothing else, at least this makes it consistent with all other >>> boards that specify CONS_INDEX. At least they don't break. >> >> I'll take a look at this. > > I've pulled the latest master > (325849ff3d4adeebb8f8f9bc5db950724df9bc21) and tried: > > make am35x_baltos_defconfig > make savedefconfg > make > > and aside from CONS_INDEX disappearing I see no problems. And "make > menuconfig" still shows CONS_INDEX = 1. > > Should I submit following patch, so that Baltos has the same config as BBB?
That shouldn't really be necessary since this series already effectively does this. It is good practice in the future, though. > diff --git a/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig b/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig > index 679b04f..1d287a8 100644 > --- a/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig > +++ b/configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > +CONFIG_ARM=y > +CONFIG_TARGET_AM335X_BALTOS=y > CONFIG_SPL=y > CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y > CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x82000000 > CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="NAND" > -CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=1 > -CONFIG_ARM=y > -CONFIG_TARGET_AM335X_BALTOS=y Cheers, -Joe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
