Hi Stephen, On 28 July 2015 at 09:44, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 07/28/2015 09:33 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >>> >>> From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com> >>> >>> For 64-bit ARM SoCs we rely on non-U-Boot code to bring up the CPU in >>> AArch64 mode so that we don't need the SPL. Non-cached memory is not >>> implemented (yet) for 64-bit ARM. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >>> --- >>> include/configs/tegra-common.h | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> >> What does start up the CPU? Is this something that will be implemented >> in SPL later? > > > At least initially, the plan is to use a separate bootloader on the boot CPU > (was named AVP, but got renamed to BPMP lite in Tegra210). It's vaguely > possible that U-Boot SPL support will exist in the future, but I'm not sure.
Ah OK. Where does that live? I think SPL would be better. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot