On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 11:54, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 28 July 2015 at 11:45, Otavio Salvador >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 23 July 2015 at 03:36, Chris Packham <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> It could be treated the same way the git project treats gitk and >>>>>> git-gui. The sources are still included in the main project and >>>>>> distributed along with the rest of it but they are merged from an >>>>>> external upstream where the real development happens. The upstream >>>>>> project is also free to make releases on whatever schedule they >>>>>> determine (although these days there isn't much development going on >>>>>> in for gitk/git-gui). >>>>> >>>>> That sounds like a useful model. However there are so few patches to >>>>> patman - is it worth it? >>>> >>>> Sure it is; I have asked it in past I think. >>>> >>>> I would like to have it in Debian, Arch and other linux distros and >>>> get more people using it to manage patch series. It is hard to explain >>>> it can be used for other project it being inside U-Boot source code. >>> >>> OK so if we do this, what's the best way to get a repo and a mailing list? >> >> I would try github or kernel.org if possible. > > I can't see mailing lists in github.
Sure but it has issues and pull requests. Likely what we need. > I've sent a request to kernel.org, and copied you. Great :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
