(It'd be nice if all the irrelevant context could be trimmed so it was
possible to quickly find the responses within the patch. As it is, there
are about 5 lines of response in hundreds of lines of quoted patch,
which makes it very easy to miss things and wastes time).
On 07/29/2015 08:42 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
Simon,
I can respond to your Kconfig questions below.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:02 PM
To: Stephen Warren
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Tom Warren; Stephen Warren; Thierry Reding
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: Add e2220-1170 board
Hi Stephen,
On 29 July 2015 at 13:48, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
diff --git a/include/configs/e2220-1170.h
+/* Board-specific serial config */
+#define CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI
+#define CONFIG_TEGRA_ENABLE_UARTA
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1 NV_PA_APB_UARTA_BASE
Do we need this still?
>
32-bit builds (i.e. w/SPL) still need this. I've removed it in a future patch
for P2571.
Is that a patch you've sent upstream; if so, which one was it? If it's
been sent already, or even just pushed into a git server somewhere in a
final form, I can apply it locally and align these new boards so they're
consistent with the latest version of p2571.h etc.
The same response applies to the other Kconfig-related questions.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot