(It'd be nice if all the irrelevant context could be trimmed so it was possible to quickly find the responses within the patch. As it is, there are about 5 lines of response in hundreds of lines of quoted patch, which makes it very easy to miss things and wastes time).

On 07/29/2015 08:42 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
Simon,

I can respond to your Kconfig questions below.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:02 PM
To: Stephen Warren
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Tom Warren; Stephen Warren; Thierry Reding
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: Add e2220-1170 board

Hi Stephen,

On 29 July 2015 at 13:48, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:

diff --git a/include/configs/e2220-1170.h

+/* Board-specific serial config */
+#define CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI
+#define CONFIG_TEGRA_ENABLE_UARTA
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1                NV_PA_APB_UARTA_BASE

Do we need this still?
>
32-bit builds (i.e. w/SPL) still need this. I've removed it in a future patch 
for P2571.

Is that a patch you've sent upstream; if so, which one was it? If it's been sent already, or even just pushed into a git server somewhere in a final form, I can apply it locally and align these new boards so they're consistent with the latest version of p2571.h etc.

The same response applies to the other Kconfig-related questions.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to