Hi,
On 31-07-15 16:25, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 31 July 2015 at 11:24, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:36:43 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 31-07-15 02:47, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 14:33 +0200, Piotr Zierhoffer wrote:
+int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int size, void *dest)
+{
+ void *current_dest;
+ uint32_t count;
+ uint32_t current_count;
+ uint32_t ecc_errors = 0;
+
+ memset(dest, 0x0, size); /* clean destination memory */
+ for (current_dest = dest;
+ current_dest < (dest + size);
+ current_dest += CONFIG_NAND_SUNXI_SPL_ECC_PAGE_SIZE) {
+ nand_read_page(offs, offs
+ < CONFIG_NAND_SUNXI_SPL_SYNDROME_PARTITIONS_END,
+ &ecc_errors);
+ count = current_dest - dest;
+
+ if (size - count > CONFIG_NAND_SUNXI_SPL_ECC_PAGE_SIZE)
+ current_count = CONFIG_NAND_SUNXI_SPL_ECC_PAGE_SIZE;
+ else
+ current_count = size - count;
+
+ memcpy(current_dest,
+ temp_buf,
+ current_count);
+ offs += CONFIG_NAND_SUNXI_SPL_ECC_PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+ return ecc_errors ? -1 : 0;
+}
No bad block marker handling?
The bootrom does not use bad block marker handling (and allwinner's
own FTL does neither for the non boot area, the actually mess up
things by writing metadata which looks like classic bad block
markers).
Hm, checking for bad block markers (and skipping bad blocks) is always a
good thing, even if it does not by itself guarantee that the data
stored in there are not corrupted.
Not on Allwinner hardware. Allwinner tools write data to the nand
which looks like bad block markers so skipping blocks which appear
marked as bad will inevitably skip valid blocks on many (most ?)
Allwinner devices.
Right this has been my observation as well.
Only in the case you soldered a new nand chip yourself and never used
Allwinner tools with it will the bad block markers remain valid. This
is overall very unlikely so it should not be something SPL handles.
Or if you've some device where the nand was not initialized from
the factory, I think some Olinuxino devices with nand fall into this
category.
I agree that is best to simply ignore bad block markers on sunxi
though, as they tend to lead to many false positives (think 60% of
the entire nand consisting of bad blocks in my experience)
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
