Hi Alexey,
2015-07-30 2:32 GMT+09:00 Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com>: > Hi Joe, Masahiro-san, > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 20:25 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 10:11 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > Hi Joe, >> > >> > 2015-05-13 7:12 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>: >> > >> > > diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig >> > > index c044ad4..85fddd2 100644 >> > > --- a/arch/arc/Kconfig >> > > +++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig >> > > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ config ARC_CACHE_LINE_SHIFT >> > > >> > > choice >> > > prompt "Target select" >> > > + optional >> > > >> > > config TARGET_DUMMY >> > > bool "Dummy target" >> > >> > >> > You do not need to add "optional" to the ARC board select >> > because Alexey intentionally added TARGET_DUMMY >> > to the top of the board select list. >> > >> > This is another solution to not lose any CONFIG_BOARD_ >> > by savedefconfig although I personally prefer this idea very much. > > It looks like I'm not the only one suffering from that change. > For UniPhier that issue was resolved by Masahiro with replacement of > "optional" with explicit default option. > > And probably that's the way we'll need to go for all other affected > Kconfigs. > > Still all proposals are more than welcome. > Alexey, you are not alone. I am also opposed to "optional" in SoC/board select menu. Maybe, we should choose a reasonable default in each select menu? (or simply choose the first choice in the menu?) I posted two patches: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/502793/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/502794/ I hope these two are not bad choice. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot