On Saturday 18 July 2009 07:03:38 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we have a mess in the drivers CONFIG naming convention > as example on I2C we have > CONFIG_I2C_XXXXX > CONFIG_DRIVER_XXX_I2C > CONFIG_XXXX_I2C > CONFIG_SYS_I2C_XXXX > > I think it will good to have common and clean naming convention > so I'll propose we use this one > CONFIG_namespace_XXXXX > and > CONFIG_SYS_namespace_XXXXX > > so it will resutly for I2C to this > > CONFIG_I2C_XXXXX > CONFIG_SYS_I2C_XXXX > > and the Makefile and KConfig it will be easier to sort and read
are there really any guidelines on what "CONFIG_SYS_" is for ? i havent really figured out what "_SYS_" is supposed to indicate, so the new proposed naming is just as confusing imo. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
