On 08/07/2015 07:42 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Enable device tree control so that we can use driver model fully and avoid > using platform data.
I'm still not convinced about this change. Re: the commit message about: What about the driver model is not being fully used without DT? Overall: What advantage does using DT have to either a developer or an end-user? I don't believe this patch fixes and bugs or enables any new features for an end-user. >From the maintainer perspective: It seems to me that it's far simpler to have a tiny struct for each device in the C code than to pull in a whole slew of DT parsing cruft just to work out the same struct at run-time. As such, this patch can only make it harder to maintain the code since there's more of it, and it's more complex. I just don't see the advantage of switching to DT for U-Boot control. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
