Hello,

On 08/07/2015 10:43 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
If there is no property named 'regulator-name' for regulators,
choose node name instead, but not directly return failure value.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <[email protected]>
Cc: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
---

Changes v3:
  None.

Changes v2:
  None. The comments update patch, see 3/6.

  drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c 
b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
index 12e141b..d4f06d5 100644
--- a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
@@ -256,7 +256,9 @@ static int regulator_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
        if (!uc_pdata->name) {
                debug("%s: dev: %s has no property 'regulator-name'\n",
                      __func__, dev->name);
-               return -EINVAL;
+               uc_pdata->name = fdt_get_name(blob, offset, NULL);
+               if (!uc_pdata->name)
+                       return -EINVAL;
        }

        if (regulator_name_is_unique(dev, uc_pdata->name))


Applied to: u-boot-pmic.

Best regards,
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to