Hi Simon,

On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Christophe,

On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard
<christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Simon,

As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one.
It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example.

Best Regards
Christophe

As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should
work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that.
I agree with that.
How do you want to proceed ? Do you agree to integrate the results of our exchanges for a new round ?

[...]

Best Regards
Christophe
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to