Hi Michal, On 31 August 2015 at 05:33, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/29/2015 05:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Update this driver to use driver model and change all users. >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >> drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c | 162 >> ++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> include/configs/zynq_microzed.h | 1 - >> include/configs/zynq_picozed.h | 1 - >> include/configs/zynq_zc70x.h | 1 - >> include/configs/zynq_zc770.h | 6 -- >> include/configs/zynq_zed.h | 1 - >> include/configs/zynq_zybo.h | 1 - >> 8 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) >> > > Unfortunately you forget to move ZynqMP target to DM. I have done it in > our internal tree and it is probably the right time to send that patches > out to cover it. Definitely they have to come to the tree first.
See my note in the cover letter. ZynqMP does not build for me and I cannot see any device tree files in U-Boot. > > I will test all others patches but TBH I have moved serial driver but I > didn't resolved that SPL case but it is wonderful that you have probably > fixed it. I am looking for to see what will be sizes with and without DM. Yes, it will be larger. Likely there is some optimisation that can be done - I put some effort into this on Rockchip. Once we have a reasonable selection of boards using this in SPL we should review it carefully and see how to improve code size / performance. Fundamentally (in terms of architectural design) I think it is reasonable, but it is worth putting effort in to achieve the best possible result. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
