On 1 September 2015 at 13:52, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 08:11 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Enabled zynq qspi controller node for zc770-xm010 board.
>>
>> => sf probe 0 -- bus0 for selecting spi controller
>> => sf probe 1 -- bus1 for selecting qspi controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts 
>> b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts
>> index 680f24c..eec4c96 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>               i2c0 = &i2c0;
>>               serial0 = &uart1;
>>               spi0 = &spi1;
>> +             spi1 = &qspi;
>
> We have discussed this internally 2 weeks ago and I would prefer to have
> spi0 = &gspi; because then we can better handle internal commands where

It is &qspi right not &gqspi

> qspi is expected on bus 0.
>
> Can you please switch it?

OK, I will make spi0 as qspi and spi1 as spi1 is that fine?

thanks!
-- 
Jagan | openedev.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to