On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:52:06PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/08/2015 02:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:53 AM, Tom Warren wrote: > >> Stephen, > >> > >> Stephen Warren wrote at Friday, September 04, 2015 9:04 PM: > >>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >>> > >>> Commit 52a7c98a1772 "tegra-common: increase malloc pool len by dfu mmc > >>> file > >>> buffer size" updated the definition of CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN for Tegra to > >>> take account of the DFU buffer size. However, this change had no effect, > >>> since > >>> typical Tegra board config headers don't set the DFU- related defines > >>> until after > >>> tegra-common.h is included. Fix this by moving the affected conditional > >>> code to > >>> tegra-common-post.h, which is included last. Also move the definition of > >>> SYS_NONCACHED_MEMORY since it's a related and adjacent definition. > >>> > >>> Fix the condition to test for the DFU feature, rather than specifically > >>> MMC DFU > >>> support, so it applies in all cases. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >> > >> Do you want me to take these last four in to u-boot-tegra for the pending > >> PR, or do you expect them to go in another way? > > > > I believe the 4 "ARM: tegra:" patches can go through the Tegra tree > > since they're independent from the other patches in the series. Thanks. > > I note that Lukasz has ack'd all the other patches, so perhaps you can > just take the whole series through the Tegra tree? At least the DFU > patches since he's maintainer there. Perhaps TomR can ack the ext4 > patches since they don't seem to have a maintainer.
I think I snagged them all in patchwork for myself. Do the Tegra ones depend on anything else? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot