On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:52:06PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 02:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 09/08/2015 09:53 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> >> Stephen,
> >>
> >> Stephen Warren wrote at Friday, September 04, 2015 9:04 PM:
> >>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
> >>>
> >>> Commit 52a7c98a1772 "tegra-common: increase malloc pool len by dfu mmc 
> >>> file
> >>> buffer size" updated the definition of CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN for Tegra to
> >>> take account of the DFU buffer size. However, this change had no effect, 
> >>> since
> >>> typical Tegra board config headers don't set the DFU- related defines 
> >>> until after
> >>> tegra-common.h is included. Fix this by moving the affected conditional 
> >>> code to
> >>> tegra-common-post.h, which is included last. Also move the definition of
> >>> SYS_NONCACHED_MEMORY since it's a related and adjacent definition.
> >>>
> >>> Fix the condition to test for the DFU feature, rather than specifically 
> >>> MMC DFU
> >>> support, so it applies in all cases.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> Do you want me to take these last four in to u-boot-tegra for the pending 
> >> PR, or do you expect them to go in another way?
> > 
> > I believe the 4 "ARM: tegra:" patches can go through the Tegra tree
> > since they're independent from the other patches in the series. Thanks.
> 
> I note that Lukasz has ack'd all the other patches, so perhaps you can
> just take the whole series through the Tegra tree? At least the DFU
> patches since he's maintainer there. Perhaps TomR can ack the ext4
> patches since they don't seem to have a maintainer.

I think I snagged them all in patchwork for myself.  Do the Tegra ones
depend on anything else?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to