On Wed 22 Jul 2009 18:00, Alessandro Rubini pondered: > > When I looked at the RFC data > > it appears that the overhead of IP fragmentation and reassembly (which > > does add overhead as the number of gateways increases) may be worth > > the time... > > Just tried it: U-Boot doesn't support reassembly, it seems.
I don't think anyone said it did. > net.c confirms it: > > /* Can't deal with fragments */ > if (ip->ip_off & htons(IP_OFFS | IP_FLAGS_MFRAG)) { > return; > } > > I don't think it's worth adding. This is based on ... ? If it reduces download time by 1/2 (1432 byte block size == 13.70 seconds, 4096 byte block size == 6.85 seconds) it might be worth the complexity... At least worth it enough to give it a try, gather some results, and then make a decision. -Robin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot