Hi Sinan, On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Sinan Akman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Fabio, I just wanted to point out that with this revert we don't only > break imx again We are not breaking imx by doing the revert. The reset still works. 623d96e89aca64c2 appeared only in 2015.10-rc4. > (whatever the initial bug was for this commit) but also we are having > ls1021atwr > working accidentally, just because writew(WCR_WDE, &wdog->wcr) clears SRS > bit which is the only requirement for reset if watchdog is not running. > > I don't have any strong opinion on this but i just wanted to make it clear > that > we are leaving both imx6 and ls1021atwr not properly implemented. I think it is the best/safest we can do at -rc4 to avoid the reset regression on ls1021. Then a proper implementation can be done for 2016.01. Do you agree? Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
