On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD<plagn...@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
> On 14:28 Fri 24 Jul     , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jean-Christophe
>> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD<plagn...@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
>> > On 09:55 Tue 21 Jul     , Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >> S5PC100 has own OneNAND controller and has different interface.
>> >> OneNAND IPL use it to S5PC100 board.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
>> >> ---
>> > is there any better than put soc specific code in generic implementatioN
>> >
>>
>> I hope so. only s3c64xx series and s5pc100 use own OneNAND controller.
>> I also don't understand why need these controller. The OneNAND has its
>> own controller at chips already.
> I known
> so what do you propose?
>

just commit the patch I sent. It's difficult to remove the ifdef since
size limitation.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to