On 17 December 2015 at 13:26, Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com> wrote: > On Thursday 17 December 2015 12:43 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 17 December 2015 at 12:33, Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com> wrote: >>> Jagan >>> >>> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 07:24 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: >>>> This patch adds time measurement and throughput calculation for >>>> sf read/write commands. >>>> >>>> The output of sf read changes from >>>> >>>> ---8<--- >>>> SF: 4096 bytes @ 0x0 Read: OK >>>> --->8--- >>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>> ---8<--- >>>> SF: 4096 bytes @ 0x0 Read: OK in 6 ms (666 KiB/s) >>>> --->8--- >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com> >> >> Was it similar to 'sf update' ? please check it once. >> > > sf update out similar but also uses progressive output, in read/write > case it can't be done. The final throughput measurement is similar on > both update and read/write.
True, that's what if we need a progressed throughput just use 'sf update' else normal 'sf read/write' It's look not good to me to add extra code on top of generic commands. What ever we wanted to extend features let's added it on 'sf update' than sf read/write, Sorry. thanks! -- Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot