Hi Simon, On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Simon Glass <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 December 2015 at 03:55, Bin Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >> IvyBridge FSP package is built with a base address at 0xfff80000, >> and does not use UPD data region. This adds basic FSP support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/Kconfig | 8 ++++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/Makefile | 4 ++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/fsp_configs.c | 45 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/ivybridge.c | 22 +++++++++++ >> .../include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 40 +++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_vpd.h | 12 ++++++ >> 6 files changed, 131 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/fsp_configs.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/ivybridge.c >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_configs.h >> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-ivybridge/fsp/fsp_vpd.h > > Acked-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > Tested on link (ivybridge non-FSP) > Tested-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > > One question: why do we need an Intel license on this code? >
It was a copy and paste from other platform (queensbay and baytrail) files. Do you think we should change it to GPLv2+? Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
