On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 23:03, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> All FSP spec v1.0 complaint FSP binary uses struct fspinit_rtbuf >> as defined by the 1.0 spec, however there are FSPs that does not >> follow 1.0 spec (possible due to that FSP predates the 1.0 spec), >> and future FSP binary that is complaint to v1.1 spec defines an >> optional paltform-specific runtime data in the struct fspinit_rtbuf. >> Hence move the definition to chipset header. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: None >> >> arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 4 ++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_configs.h | 4 ++++ >> arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h | 15 --------------- >> arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_support.h | 1 - >> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h > > Tested on Minnowmax: > Tested-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
applied to u-boot-x86/next, thanks! _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot