On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 06:24:45 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 2015年12月24日 11:42, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 04:26:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: > >> Hi Marek, > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > >> On 2015年12月24日 11:02, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 03:50:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: > >>>> Hi Marek, > >>>> > >>>> On 2015年12月24日 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 01:51:23 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: > >>>>>> Show sector erase progress with dot and comma. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou <tho...@wytron.com.tw> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>> > >>>>> Shouldn't this go into common code ? > >>>> > >>>> The code to print a dot is minimal. It will cost more if this go into > >>>> common code. > >>> > >>> But then this driver behaves in a non-standard manner AND noone > >>> benefits from this functionality but this driver. > >> > >> The sector erase might take very long when there are a lot of sectors to > >> erase, say 12 min to 50 min for 1024 sectors on the 10m50 board. Without > >> the display of progress, it will look like the board hangs. > > > > Yeah, that I do understand and I agree this is a good idea :) > > > >> The dotting code comes from the old cfi_flash.c. Some other parallel > >> flash have this, but not spi-flash. It is trivial to add though. > > > > Urm, altera_qspi is CFI, right ? So can we stuff this into common code or > > not? Sorry if I am confused and off the mark. > > No worries. I think the dotting is best done per driver.
Well why do you think so ? > We can have > common behavior. But there is little advantage to make it common code. > > Merry Xmas. Merry Xmas to you too! Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot