On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 01:12:21PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Simon, > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:22:01PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >Hi Peng, > > > >On 22 December 2015 at 02:14, Peng Fan <van.free...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com> > >> > >> Whether CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER is defined or not, should always > >> check to free 'buff' to avoid memory leak. > > > >Are you sure? I believe need_buff is only true if the simple parser is > >being used. > > If CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER is defined and len is not -1, need_buff is 1, then > will malloc buffer and assign return value to buff. > But we only free buff, when CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER is not defined and > need_buff is 1. > So I think this may leaks memory.
Yes, this may happen. The code itself however should be rearranged (not in this patch) to be clear on what we're doing here and if len will really should ever be -1 (or always be -1?) or not. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
