On 01/14/2016 01:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Sync everything except the display panel, which will come in a future patch.
One USB port is left disabled since we don't want to support it in U-Boot.
It would be useful to mention which version of Linux this DT content
came from.
BTW, this series (at least this patch) seems to have a significant
number of "git am" conflicts when I try to apply it to either v2016.01
or u-boot/master as of today. Consequently I can't apply it to test it.
Which commit/branch is it based on?
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
b/arch/arm/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
+ pinmux@70000014 {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&state_default>;
I agree that the DT content that's common between U-Boot's and Linux's
copies of the DT files should be identical. However, I wonder if it
makes sense to include nodes (and perhaps even properties) in U-Boot's
DT that U-Boot doesn't use.
I can see the argument that keeping the files identical is easier to
track and remove any differences.
However, I'd also argue that keeping the U-Boot DT files lean (i.e. only
containing the nodes U-Boot uses) will allow easier determination of
exactly what parts of the DT U-Boot uses, and hence perhaps highlight
any parts that might still need conversion.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
