On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:46:15PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> +Mugunthan, Tom
> 
> On 17 January 2016 at 03:56, Christophe Ricard
> <christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Convert omap3_spi driver to DM and keep compatibility with previous
> > mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ric...@st.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/spi/Kconfig     |   6 +
> >  drivers/spi/omap3_spi.c | 439 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/spi/omap3_spi.h |  14 +-
> >  3 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> This is a pretty painful conversion, with lots of #ifdefs. I think it
> would be possible to use a common pointer type and reduce this.
> 
> But perhaps it does not matter - how long must we be in the state of
> supporting legacy SPI? Can we convert all TI boards to driver model?

We _really_ need some way to support more than one board per binary
before we can move everything to DM only.

I think we can kind of do this today if we stick to using platform data
for everything that's board-specific rather than SoC-defined.  What we
talked about at ELCE was auto-generating the pdata from the device tree,
I think.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to