Hi, On 9 February 2016 at 11:56, Steve Rae <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:08 AM, york sun <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/09/2016 09:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:08:35PM +0000, york sun wrote: >> >> On 02/09/2016 12:00 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >>> Dear York, >> >>> >> >>> In message < >> am4pr0401mb1732ec48981eed9b70ce23859a...@am4pr0401mb1732.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> >> you wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Is there a way to exclude specific emails from the CC list when using >> patman? >> >>>> The no-longer-existed email address got rejected by SMTP server. >> >>> >> >>> That';s just papering over the problems, and thus the wrong approach. >> >>> >> >>> The correct thing to do is having the wrong addresses fixed or >> >>> removed. >> >> >> >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> >> >> I don't think we are on the same page. When I mention invalid email >> address, it >> >> is not the format of email, but the server rejects the address because >> the >> >> account has been disabled/deleted. It is not the knowledge patman for >> git >> >> send-email can acquire. My current workaround is to send patches >> manually using >> >> git send-email. >> > >> > No, I think you are on the same page. Wolfgang is saying we shouldn't >> > have dead email addresses on file (... where patman picks them up, ie >> > MAINTAINERS). In your case, it should only fail on bad freescale/nxp >> > emails, yes? Maybe there's more stuff to poke people about and/or drop? >> > >> >> Good we are on the same page. Let me be specific on this issue I am >> facing. For >> the RFC patch I posted yesterday http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/580577/, >> if I >> run script/get_maintainer.pl, >> >> $ perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl >> 0001-arm-ls1021aqds-Convert-to-driver-model-and-enable-se.patch >> Albert Aribaud <[email protected]> (maintainer:ARM) >> Alison Wang <[email protected]> (maintainer:LS1021AQDS BOARD) >> Hans de Goede <[email protected]> >> >> (commit_signer:34/85=40%,authored:21/85=25%,added_lines:97/202=48%,removed_lines:14/47=30%) >> Simon Glass <[email protected]> >> >> (commit_signer:18/85=21%,authored:5/85=6%,commit_signer:1/2=50%,commit_signer:5/6=83%) >> Ian Campbell <[email protected]> (commit_signer:18/85=21%) >> Stefan Roese <[email protected]> >> >> (commit_signer:9/85=11%,authored:5/85=6%,added_lines:13/202=6%,removed_lines:3/47=6%) >> York Sun <[email protected]> >> >> (commit_signer:8/85=9%,commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%,commit_signer:1/6=17%,authored:1/6=17%,removed_lines:216/221=98%) >> Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> >> (authored:5/85=6%,removed_lines:5/47=11%) >> Lokesh Vutla <[email protected]> (removed_lines:3/47=6%) >> Bin Meng <[email protected]> (commit_signer:1/2=50%,authored:1/2=50%) >> Haikun Wang <[email protected]> >> (commit_signer:5/6=83%,authored:5/6=83%,added_lines:221/221=100%) >> Jagan Teki <[email protected]> (commit_signer:1/6=17%) >> [email protected] (open list) >> >> In this list, Haikun Wang is no longer with Freescale/NXP. Since he is not >> a >> maintainer, there is nothing to fix. His address is in the commit history >> and >> nothing can/should be done to change that. >> >> I understand this issue is related to my SMTP server which checks local >> recipients before accepting emails. I can't be the only one having this >> trouble. >> >> It is not a huge deal if this can't be fixed. I asked to see if there is a >> quick >> fix. >> >> York >> >> > yes - I am having this issue too; and I have also complaints about me > cc'ing too many people on my patches! > So, my work-around is: > - when patman executes "git send-email --annotate ...", it gives me the > chance to review my patches (in my editor 'vi') > - while this is occurring, from my editor ('vi'), I run ":e /tmp/patman.*" > (there is always only one file...) and I manually update the list of > emails.... > - then after saving that file, the "git send-email" sends to the > appropriate people. > > Ugly -- but it works! > Thanks, Steve
Also -m disables the get_maintainer feature altogether. Do we need to add an email blacklist to work around this problem? I get it a lot but it doesn't really bother me. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
