On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Peter Tyser<pty...@xes-inc.com> wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 23:05 Fri 21 Aug , Peter Tyser wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> >>> ---
[snip] >>> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86 >> could we have a generic name (not arch) >> CONFIG_GENERIC_MALLOC_INIT >> >> and then define it in the configs/arch.h > > I thought the cleanest fix would be to update the x86 call to > mem_malloc_init() to match all the other architectures', but didn't want > to delve into the x86 arch init code. > > I think adding a new CONFIG_* option to handle 1 non-conforming > architecture is dirtier than syncing up the x86 init code in any case. > I am currently undertaking a fairly significant tidy up of some x86 loose ends. One that I noticed (and have not touched just yet) is how the x86 allocates the malloc pool. After these (Peter's) patches get applied, I will revisit the x86 malloc and bring it into line with the other arches Regards, G > Best, > Peter > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot