On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:43:58AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:42, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:39:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Joe, > >> > >> On 7 May 2015 at 03:17, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi Simon, > >> > > >> > Is there a way to make buildman compile sandbox with a non-system tool > >> > chain? I've tried creating an alias from sandbox to i386 and removing > >> > the "root" entry. It then simply claims not to have a sandbox tool > >> > chain. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > -Joe > >> > >> FYI I've prepared a series that permits: > >> > >> [toolchain-prefix] > >> sandbox = /path/to/sandbox-gcc > > > > And in this case it just takes what it finds, if it exists right? ie I > > can also do: > > sandbox = /usr/bin/clang > > ? > > What should it set CROSS_COMPILE to in that case?
Ah, so that's where life is going to get "fun" for buildman and llvm. For sandbox, nothing. For other arches, well, I need to toy with cc-option I think to see if we can make life a lot easier than doc/README.llvm says to do, today. Not supporting llvm in buildman today is OK since we don't well support it anyhow, but I want to fix that going forward. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
