On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:01:10PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >
> >> Tom & Albert,
> >> Please approve the creation of a custodian repo for the Broadcom (arm) 
> >> boards.
> >> ( Wolfgang already has my public key... )
> >>
> >> Wolfgang stated:
> >> > Before I can set up a new custodian repo, please post your
> >> > offer on the U-Boot mailing list -  I think the chips in question
> >> > belong to the ARM architecture (?), so both the ARM custodian (Albert)
> >> > and Tom should agree with the creation of such a new repo.  Once I
> >> > have their "go" it is only a matter of minutes.
> >
> > So, I do have a few BCM patches outstanding (and I'm build testing them
> > now).  ELC kicked -rc1 out a week (I'll be tagging it once I have this
> > series happy enough to push out with it).  Are you expecting the volume
> > of boards to increase?  Thanks!
> 
> No -- only planning to add 2 new boards....
> It is just that with the current process, I waiting "months" to get
> patches applied - so Marek suggested that maybe I need to be a
> custodian, so that I can move things along....

Er, months?  Sorry, I'm not seeing it right away at least:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=*
(and questions about how did .... get into state ... ? are answered with
"I took a stab at it").

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to