On 28.4.2016 15:07, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:44:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Simon and Tom, >> >> On 23.2.2016 06:55, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Enable SPL FIT support for the Linksprite pcDuino3 as an example of how this >>> feature is used. >>> >>> This is only for demonstration purposes and is not to be applied. >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: None >>> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c | 5 +++++ >>> configs/Linksprite_pcDuino3_defconfig | 4 ++++ >>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> I have played with SPL_FIT support and find some things >> First of all >> "mkimage: Support placing data outside the FIT" >> (722ebc8f84d5bccd2e70fad1079a0dd40cceddec) >> is missing description in usage function to see what -E options does. >> >> Then I have found a problem with fit address calculation because it has >> to be aligned. >> I have sent an RFC for it >> "SPL: FIT: Align loading address for header" >> >> I have also added support for ram load for FIT - please review. >> "SPL: FIT: Enable SPL_FIT_LOAD in RAM based boot mode" > > I think these are reasonable. > >> And also for SD fat based images. >> "SPL: FIT: Enable SPL_FIT_LOAD for sd bootmode for fat partions" > > Ug, sorry. You missed the series from Lokesh that added a bunch more > features along those lines. I didn't pull them in since it was past the > merge window but will for the next release.
Ah ok. Will look. > >> Is there any plan to support falcon mode? >> Also I see kind of interesting to have one fit image with ATF, Secure >> OS, bitstreams and U-Boot and Linux kernel + dtbs >> Currently spl_load_simple_fit() seems to me expecting to blindly read >> the first fit partition and say this is u-boot and then based >> configuration description choose dtb. >> >> Do you have any plan to get even u-boot image from configurations instead? >> The we should get a support for loadables. > > Well, the first itch I needed scratched was supporting many similar > platforms in DM+DT from a single binary, and that's what's there today. > So long as we can do things in a clean way, all of these other use cases > sound interesting and clearly useful to some people, so I don't object. > How do you identify platform you are running at? Thanks, Michal _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
