On 05/04/2016 01:48 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
+Tom Rini

Hi Stephen,

On 4 May 2016 at 13:46, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
On 05/04/2016 01:31 PM, Simon Glass wrote:

Hi Stephen,

On 4 May 2016 at 12:57, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:

On 04/19/2016 04:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:


From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>

In some cases, drivers may not want to bind to a device. Allow bind() to
return -ENODEV in this case, and don't treat this as an error. This can
be useful in situations where some information source other than the DT
node's main status property indicates whether the device should be
enabled, for example other DT properties might indicate this, or the
driver might query non-DT sources such as system fuses or a version
number
register.



Simon, this series is assigned to you in patchwork. Are you the right
person
to apply it?


Yes. but not for this release, right?


Patch 2 in the series (which depends on this patch) fixes a bug for Tegra
boards with LCD panels. Admittedly it appears to be only cosmetic (an error
message is printed at boot), but "it's a bug" seems to satisfy the
requirement to apply it for this release.

Sorry, I didn't know that. Given the core nature of this patch I would
rather wait, and apply it next week. Let me know if you disagree.

I suppose that it's been broken long enough that another release won't matter.

Was my explanation of the bug in the description of patch 2/2 not clear in some way?
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to