Hi Marek, On 1 June 2016 at 07:36, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/31/2016 08:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 31 May 2016 at 05:55, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:00:24PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> >>>> Tweak the tiny printf code to also provide similarly tiny sprintf() >>>> implementation. This is not comformant with POSIX for sure, but it >>>> keeps the size down while still behaving rather reasonably. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Tom Rini <[email protected]> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> >> >> Also please see this one: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/622267/ >> >> It uses a function passed in. > > Oh, I knew I saw some s*printf() stuff from you. Works for me :)
OK good. It works for me too but I'm sure it can be improved (code size, use of division, etc.), so see how you go. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
