Hi Michal,

On 02.06.2016 07:31, Michal Simek wrote:
On 1.6.2016 18:22, Nathan Rossi wrote:
Commit a058052c "net: phy: do not read configuration register on reset",
changes the behaviour of the phy_reset function such that the state of
the BMCR register is not preserved during reset.

Reorder the phy_reset and genphy_config_aneg calls for some of the
marvell phy drivers so that auto-negotiation occurs after reset.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Hershberger <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 11 ++++++-----
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
index d2e68d4..40284a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
@@ -414,10 +414,10 @@ static int m88e1145_config(struct phy_device *phydev)
                        MIIM_M88E1145_RGMII_TX_DELAY;
        phy_write(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MIIM_88E1145_PHY_EXT_CR, reg);

-       genphy_config_aneg(phydev);
-
        phy_reset(phydev);

+       genphy_config_aneg(phydev);
+

As you see from my patch
1b008fdb06848c7c84e7c1a4a9b2b76239550555
you should return value from genphy_config_aneg() which should be fixed
everywhere.

Also as you see above you do some writes to the phy and the question is
if you should run phy_reset here.
Based on my patch above and investigating I found that phy_reset is
called before this function is called and not sure if phy should be
reset twice.

Some changes to the PHY registers need a soft-reset to occur
before these changes to be effective. Not sure if this is the case
here though.

But I share your thoughts about this phy_reset() being called now
in some of the xxx_config() functions and not in others. Your patch
mentions that phy_reset() is already called in phy_connect_dev(),
which not all ethernet drivers do right now AFAICT.

We should perhaps take a look at the Linux Marvell PHY driver to
check how it is done there.

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to