On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:51:20PM +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 15:37 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:31:30PM +0000, Langer, Thomas wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Alexey, > > > > > > This feature is already available in u-boot, please look for > > > 'print_buffer'. > > > > ... make this a candidate for moving over to the linux kernel way? > > Could you please elaborate here a little bit? > I didn't quite understood what do you propose really... > Switch in U-Boot to kernel's hexdump or send patches with U-Boot's > print_buffer to LKML?
OK, to be clear and answer both emails, we should: a) Only add the new header when calling the new function b) Add further parts to the series to convert current users of print_buffer to these functions instead to reduce the mental changes one makes when doing / reading U-Boot code vs Linux Kernel code. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
