On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Ziyuan Xu <xzy...@rock-chips.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 2016年08月28日 03:39, Sandy Patterson wrote:
>
>> Rock2 has been tested with back to brom feature. The tricky part is that
>> with this feature the default environment is inside u-boot, and it's
>> defined for every rk3288 board independetly. So I just changed it for
>> rock2 here.
>>
>> Solve by moving environment after u-boot before 1M boundary
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sandy Patterson <apatter...@sightlogix.com>
>> ---
>>
>
> According to your change, I think your commit message is not match.
> Enable ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM for rock2 board???


Oops. It looks like my change to the rock2_defconfig ended up in the other
patch. I'll resubmit with the defconfig in this patch.

>
>
>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>   include/configs/rock2.h | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/configs/rock2.h b/include/configs/rock2.h
>> index ee924c3..946367f 100644
>> --- a/include/configs/rock2.h
>> +++ b/include/configs/rock2.h
>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>>     #define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
>>   #define CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV 0
>> -/* SPL @ 32k for ~36k
>> - * ENV @ 96k
>> - * u-boot @ 128K
>> +/* SPL @ 32k for 34k
>> + * u-boot directly after @ 68k for 400k or so
>> + * ENV @ 992k
>>    */
>> -#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (96 * 1024)
>> +#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET ((1024-32) * 1024)
>>     #define CONFIG_SYS_WHITE_ON_BLACK
>>   #define CONFIG_CONSOLE_SCROLL_LINES           10
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to