On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote:
> The callers of the proposed/rejected kwboot.c errno diff were all
> checked but the test of the result in the caller of this one
> seems to have been missed indeed.
> Sorry for missing this and
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au>
The whole FIT image loading complex still is quite messy in regards to return
values and the like (I still have two patches I want to send that fix masked
and incorrect return values), so it's basically still a work-in-progress :-)
I'll send a formal patch in a few.
U-Boot mailing list