On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:45:14PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:44:17AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > Gah... I have to screw it up while resolving conflicts with upstream 
> > changes.
> > Obviously MACH_TYPE has to remain the same. Will do v2. I'm sorry for that.
> But why do we even need to set MACH_TYPE these days?

That's only needed for non-device tree kernel boot. These boards run mostly
vendor provided kernels based on TI 2.6.32 or 2.6.37 kernel tree with
daughter boards specific patches on top of it. Enric is concerned not
to break that support, so I'm trying to keep it.

U-Boot mailing list

Reply via email to