On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:18:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Coverity complains that this can overflow. If we later increase the size
> of one of the strings in the table, it could happen.
> 
> Adjust the code to protect against this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 150964)
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Adjust to deal with what strncpy() actually does (I think)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop unwanted #include
> 
>  common/image.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c
> index 0e86c13..016f263 100644
> --- a/common/image.c
> +++ b/common/image.c
> @@ -588,9 +588,11 @@ const table_entry_t *get_table_entry(const table_entry_t 
> *table, int id)
>  static const char *unknown_msg(enum ih_category category)
>  {
>       static char msg[30];
> +     static char unknown_str = "Unknown ";
>  
> -     strcpy(msg, "Unknown ");
> -     strcat(msg, table_info[category].desc);
> +     strcpy(msg, unknown_str);
> +     strncat(msg, table_info[category].desc,
> +             sizeof(msg) - sizeof(unknown_str));

We still need to subtract 1 more here at the end, for the NUL don't we?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to